EFL LEARNERS’ SELF-REPORTED SPEAKING PRIORITIZATIONS AND THEIR ASSOCIATIONS WITH SPEAKING CONFIDENCE AND PRIOR EXPERIENCE
Main Article Content
Abstract
Despite extensive research on communication strategies used by EFL learners during oral production, relatively little is known about the specific aspects that students prioritize while speaking and how these prioritizations are associated with learner-related factors. Existing scholarship remains limited and predominantly performance-based, with insufficient attention to learners’ own voices. The present study thus fills these voids by examining 244 Vietnamese EFL undergraduates’ speaking prioritizations (i.e., self-reported focus on linguistic, non-linguistic, and interactive communication aspects during speaking) and their associations with perceived confidence and prior experience (i.e., speaking practice frequency and prior school backgrounds). Drawing on models of attentional resources in second language speaking (Robinson, 2003; Skehan, 1998), this study collected data through a questionnaire-based mixed quantitative-qualitative design, with rating-scale items and one open-ended question. The quantitative results showed that participants reported prioritizing linguistic, non-linguistic, and interactive communication aspects at varying degrees, with interactive communication rated higher than linguistic aspects. Moreover, weak-to-moderate correlations were observed between speaking prioritizations and perceived confidence as well as prior experience. Students of differing levels of perceived confidence and prior experience also reported different linguistic, non-linguistic and interactive prioritizations in speaking. The qualitative findings further identified learner-related factors that contribute to students’ self-reported speaking confidence and focus of attention. The current study offers potential pedagogical implications that inform learner-responsive speaking instruction and contribute to a more nuanced understanding of oral communication development in EFL contexts.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (4th ed.). Pearson.
Cambridge English Language Assessment. (2008). Assessing speaking performance–Level B2. UCLES. https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/images/168619-assessing-speaking-performance-at-level-b2.pdf
Cheng, L. (2014). Consequences, impact, and washback. In A. J. Kunnan (Ed.), The companion to language assessment (pp. 1130–1145). Wiley-Blackwell.
Chou, M. H. (2018). Speaking anxiety and strategy use for learning English as a foreign language in full and partial English‐medium instruction contexts. TESOL Quarterly, 52(3), 611-633. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.455
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches. Sage Publications.
Dörnyei, Z. (2006). Individual differences in second language acquisition. AILA Review, 19(1), 42-68. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.19.05dor
Dunn, O. J. (1964). Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics, 6(3), 241-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1964.10490181
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage Publications.
Fukuta, J., & Yamashita, J. (2015). Effects of cognitive demands on attention orientation in L2 oral production. System, 53, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.06.010
Gabitova, L., Gabitov, A., Shayakhmetova, L., & Mukhametzyanova, L. (2023). Use of quest technology as a means of developing creative abilities in the process of teaching English language speaking. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 14(3), 412-416. https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2023.19578
IELTS. (n.d.). IELTS speaking key assessment criteria. https://ielts.org/cdn/ielts-guides/ielts-speaking-key-assessment-criteria.pdf
Jackson, D. O., & Suethanapornkul, S. (2013). The cognition hypothesis: A synthesis and meta-analysis of research on second language task complexity. Language Learning, 63(2), 330-367. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12008
Khan, A., Naqvi, S., & Mathew, P. (2024). Influence of task type and proficiency on communication strategies used by Omani EFL learners. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 11(3), 737-752. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP231011055K
Krashen, S. (1982). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Pergamon Press.
Lee, J. S., & Lee, K. (2019). Affective factors, virtual intercultural experiences, and L2 willingness to communicate in in-class, out-of-class, and digital settings. Language Teaching Research, 24(6), 813-833. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819831408
Li, C., & Wei, L. (2022). Anxiety, enjoyment, and boredom in language learning amongst junior secondary students in rural China: How do they contribute to L2 achievement? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45(1), 93-108. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263122000031
Li, J., Wang, C., Zhao, Y., & Li, Y. (2023). Boosting learners’ confidence in learning English: Can self‐efficacy‐based intervention make a difference? TESOL Quarterly, 58(4), 1518-1547. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3292
Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2021). How languages are learned (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Ma, L., Xiao, L., & Liu, J. (2024). Motivational beliefs of urban and rural students in English as a foreign language learning: The case of China. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45(5), 1524-1537. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2021.1991933
Malicka, A., & Levkina, M. (2012). Measuring task complexity: Does L2 proficiency matter? In A. Shehadeh & C. Coombe (Eds.), Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts: Research and implementation (pp. 43–66). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.4.06mal
McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276-282. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031
Nakatani, Y. (2006). Developing an oral communication strategy inventory. The Modern Language Journal, 90(2), 151-168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00390.x
Newton, J. M., & Nation, I. S. P. (2020). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429203114
Ortega, L. (2005). What do learners plan? Learner-driven attention to form during pre-task planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 77-109). John Benjamins.
Pawlak, M. (2018). Investigating the use of speaking strategies in the performance of two communicative tasks: The importance of communicative goal. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 269-291. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.2.5
Pekrun, R., & Stephens, E. J. (2010). Achievement emotions: A control-value approach. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(4), 238-255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00259.x
Pennycook, A. (2014). Principled polycentrism and resourceful speakers. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 11(4), 1-19. https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/handle/10453/31753
Pham, H. C. (2021). English language education in rural areas: Current issues, complexities and ways forward. VNU Journal of Science: Education Research, 37(4), 39-48. https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1159/vnuer.4538
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64(4), 878–912. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079
Rayati, M., Abedi, H., & Aghazadeh, S. (2022). EFL learners’ speaking strategies: A study of low and high proficiency learners. MEXTESOL Journal, 46(4), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.61871/mj.v46n4-5
Robinson, P. (2003). Attention and memory during SLA. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 631-678). Blackwell.
Saieed, M. N. A, Zarei, A. A., & Sarani, A. (2024). Problem-based learning affecting features of speaking proficiency. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 75-91. https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2023.41996.2888
Savignon, S. J. (2003). Teaching English as communication: A global perspective. World Englishes, 22(1), 55-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971X.00272
Shirkhani, S., & Meigouni, M.M.E. A. (2020). Oral communication strategies used by Iranian EFL learners and their relationship with the learners’ self-efficacy beliefs and anxiety level. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 8(1), 1–20.
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford University Press.
Snyder, J. S., Schwiedrzik, C. M., Vitela, A. D., & Melloni, L. (2015). How previous experience shapes perception in different sensory modalities. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00594
Su, Y. (2021). College students’ oral communication strategy use, self-perceived English proficiency and confidence, and communication anxiety in Taiwan’s EFL learning. Educational Studies, 57(6), 650-669. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2021.1919677
Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford University Press.
Tomczak, M., & Tomczak, E. (2014). The need to report effect size estimates revisited. An overview of some recommended measures of effect size. Trends in Sport Sciences, 21(1), 19–25.
Wang, Q., & Lee, J. H. (2014). Korean advanced EFL learners’ attentional allocation during task planning and its influence on speaking. English Language & Literature Teaching, 20(3), 191-210.