AUTHORIAL PRESENCE IN ENGLISH THESIS WRITING: VIETNAMESE WRITERS’ VIEWS ON SELF-REFERENCE
Main Article Content
Abstract
Writer identity or authorial presence has drawn tremendous attention in the past decades; however, previous studies tend to focus on corpus analyses of self-reference use in research articles written by established researchers. It is important to understand not only how self-reference devices are used, but also why they are used by novice writers such as students, especially those who use English as a foreign language. Research in this area, however, is still limited. To address this research gap, the present study examines Vietnamese students’ perceptions of self-reference in English research writing. Data were collected from 141 Master’s students at different thesis writing stages: Pre-writing, Writing, and Completed, through questionnaires and interviews. Results of Chi-square tests show no significant differences across the groups in their perceptions of self-reference and rhetorical functions. While students widely accept indirect self-reference, uncertainty remains regarding first-person pronouns. Many students avoid “I” due to concerns about objectivity, shaped by academic norms, institutional expectations, and prior exposure to research. The study highlights the need for targeted writing instruction that considers disciplinary and cultural influences.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Abdeljaoued, M. (2026). From hedging to self-mention: Seventy years of stance in doctoral theses and what it means for EAP. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 79, Article 101616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101616
Çandarlı, D., Bayyurt, Y., & Martı, L. (2015). Authorial presence in L1 and L2 novice academic writing: Cross-linguistic and cross-cultural perspectives. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 192-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.10.001
Casanave, C. P. (1995). Local interactions: Constructing contexts for composing in a graduate sociology program. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 83-110). Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Darwish, H. (2019). Writer-reader interaction: Writer’s stance in English L1 and L2 [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Bedfordshire.
Dobakhti, L. (2011). The discussion section of research articles in applied linguistics: Generic structure and stance features [PhD thesis]. University of Malaya.
Escobar, C. C. F., & Fernández, L. C. (2017). EFL learners’ development of voice in academic writing: Lexical bundles, boosters/hedges and stance-taking strategies. GiST Education and Learning Research Journal, 15, 96-124. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.392
Gerrard, D. (2026). Establishing a presence: Self-mention in L2 (Czech) doctoral writing and expert writing in linguistics. Discourse and Interaction, 19(1), 25-46. https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2026-1-25
Harwood, N. (2006). (In)appropriate personal pronoun use in political science: A qualitative study and a proposed heuristic for future research. Written Communication, 23(4), 424-450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088306293921
Hyland, K. (2001). Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 20(3), 207-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-4906(00)00012-0
Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(8), 1091-1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(02)00035-8
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365
Hyland, K. (2008). Disciplinary voices: Interactions in research writing. English Text Construction, 1(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.1.1.03hyl
Khedri, M. (2016). Are we visible? An interdisciplinary data-based study of self-mention in research articles. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 52(3), 403-430. https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2016-0017
Khedri, M., & Kritsis, K. (2020). How do we make ourselves heard in the writing of a research article? A study of authorial references in four disciplines. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 40(2), 194-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2020.1753011
Lee, T. K. (2013). Author manifestation and perceptions of self in Chinese academic discourse: Comparisons with English. Languages in Contrast, 13(1), 90-112. https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.13.1.05lee
Lehman, I. M., & Sułkowski, Ł. (2023). Reader perceptions of authorial voice in top-tier management journals: The case of doctoral students of management from Eastern Europe. Journal of Management Education, 47(4), 349-387. https://doi.org/10.1177/10525629231170619
Li, C., & Wei, R. (2026). Author stance and engagement in research articles on educational equity: A comparison between Chinese and Australian authors. PLOS One, 21(4), e0344083. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344083
MacIntyre, R. (2017). The use of personal pronouns in the writing of argumentative essays by EFL writers. RELC Journal, 50(1), 6-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217730139
Martínez, I. A. (2005). Native and non-native writers’ use of first person pronouns in the different sections of biology research articles in English. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 174-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.06.001
Menkabu, A. (2017). Stance and engagement in postgraduate writing: A comparative study of English NS and Arab EFL student writers in Linguistics and Literature [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Essex.
Mora, A. (2017). Writer identity construction in Mexican students of applied linguistics. Cogent Education, 4(1), Article 1365412. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1365412
Peng, J.-E. (2019). Authorial voice constructed in citation in literature reviews of doctoral theses: Variations across training contexts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 37, 11-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.11.001
Pho, P. D. (2013). Authorial stance in research articles. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137032782
Sugiharto, S. (2025). Voice in academic writing: The transpositioning of author identity in responding to manuscript blind reviewers. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 28(2), 715-728. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v28i2.12386
Uba, S. Y. (2017). Authorial stance in accounting PhD theses in a Nigerian university [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University of Leeds.
Vassileva, I. (1998). Who am I/who are we in academic writing?: A contrastive analysis of authorial presence in English, German, French, Russian and Bulgarian. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 163-185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.1998.tb00128.x
Wang, J., & Zeng, L. (2021). Disciplinary recognized self-presence: Self-mention used with hedges and boosters in PhD students’ research writing. Sage Open, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211005454
Wu, G., & Zhu, Y. (2014). Self-mention and authorial identity construction in English and Chinese research articles: A contrastive study. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 10(2), 133-158. https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.v10i2.28557
Xia, G. (2018). A cross-disciplinary corpus-based study on English and Chinese native speakers’ use of first-person pronouns in academic English writing. Text & Talk, 38(1), 93-113. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2017-0032
Zhao, J., & Liu, Y. (2021). A developmental view of authorial voice construction in master’s thesis: A case study of two novice L2 writers. Sage Open, 11(4), Article 21582440211054483. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211054483