GENERATIVE AI AND THE RESHAPING OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING: A COGNITIVE PROCESS PERSPECTIVE
Main Article Content
Abstract
Addressing how Generative AI (GenAI) reshapes the cognitive act of second language (L2) writing, this conceptual article draws on recent empirical literature (2023–2026). It grounds its analysis in the Cognitive Process Theory of Writing (CPTW), chosen because its decomposition of planning, translating, and reviewing under working-memory limits illuminates how cognitive labor is redistributed between learner and machine. Through CPTW, three key insights emerge. First, planning undergoes an externalization of productive struggle: offloading idea generation causes learners to bypass essential rhetorical problem framing. Second, translating experiences a voice constraint: model optimization toward conventionality flattens non-standard L2 syntax and homogenizes authorial voice. Third, reviewing suffers a reviewing bifurcation, splitting evaluation into goal-level appraisal and opaque decision-level monitoring. Theoretically, GenAI transforms writing into a co-generative sociotechnical practice requiring GenAI feedback literacy. Pedagogically, educators should adopt process-oriented assessments, using pre-prompting framing logs, annotated drafts, and prompt histories to evaluate cognitive engagement over polished final products.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Allen, T. J., & Mizumoto, A. (2024). ChatGPT over my friends: Japanese English-as-a-foreign-language learners’ preferences for editing and proofreading strategies. RELC Journal, 57(1), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882241262533
Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(3), 219-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309341564
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (Eds.). (1987). The psychology of written composition (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203812310
Boudouaia, A., Mouas, S., & Kouider, B. (2024). A study on ChatGPT-4 as an innovative approach to enhancing English as a foreign language writing learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(6), 1289-1317. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241247465
Bucol, J. L., & Sangkawong, N. (2025). Exploring ChatGPT as a writing assessment tool. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 62(3), 867-882. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2024.2363901
Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
Cong-Lem, N., & Daneshfar, S. (2024). Generative AI and second/foreign language education from Vygotsky’s cultural-historical perspective. In H.P. Bui & E. Namaziandost (Eds.), Innovations in technologies for language teaching and learning (Vol. 1159, pp. 175- 188). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-63447-5_10
Crompton, H., Edmett, A., Ichaporia, N., & Burke, D. (2024). AI and English language teaching: Affordances and challenges. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(6), 2503-2529. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13460
Cumming, A. (2002). Assessing L2 writing: Alternative constructs and ethical dilemmas. Assessing Writing, 8(2), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1075-2935(02)00047-8
Dong, L. (2024). “Brave new world” or not? A mixed-methods study of the relationship between second language writing learners’ perceptions of ChatGPT, behaviors of using ChatGPT, and writing proficiency. Current Psychology, 43, 19581-19495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-05728-9
Doshi, A. R., & Hauser, O. P. (2024). Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content. Science Advances, 10(28), Article eadn5290. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adn5290
Facchinetti, R. (2021). News discourse and the dissemination of knowledge and perspective: From print and monomodal to digital and multisemiotic. Journal of Pragmatics, 175, 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.015
Fan, Y., Tang, L., Le, H., Shen, K., Tan, S., Zhao, Y., Shen, Y., Li, X., & Gašević, D. (2024). Beware of metacognitive laziness: Effects of generative artificial intelligence on learning motivation, processes, and performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(2), 489-530. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13544
Fathi, J., & Rahimi, M. (2026). Utilising artificial intelligence-enhanced writing mediation to develop academic writing skills in EFL learners: A qualitative study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 39(1-2), 263-302. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2374772
Feng, H., Li, K., & Zhang, L. J. (2025). What does AI bring to second language writing? A systematic review (2014-2024). Language Learning & Technology, 29(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73629
Ferrara, E. (2024). GenAI against humanity: Nefarious applications of generative artificial intelligence and large language models. Journal of Computational Social Science, 7, 549-569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-024-00250-1
Fleisig, E., Smith, G., Bossi, M., Rustagi, I., Yin, X., & Klein, D. (2024). Linguistic bias in ChatGPT: Language models reinforce dialect discrimination. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 13541–13564. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.750
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600
Ghafouri, M., Hassaskhah, J., & Mahdavi-Zafarghandi, A. (2024). From virtual assistant to writing mentor: Exploring the impact of a ChatGPT-based writing instruction protocol on EFL teachers’ self-efficacy and learners’ writing skill. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241239764
Gozali, I., Wijaya, A. R. T., Lie, A., Cahyono, B. Y., & Suryati, N. (2024). Leveraging the potential of ChatGPT as an automated writing evaluation (AWE) tool: Students’ feedback literacy development and AWE tools integration framework. The JALT CALL Journal, 20(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v20n1.1200
Guo, K., & Li, D. (2024). Understanding EFL students’ use of self-made AI chatbots as personalized writing assistance tools: A mixed methods study. System, 124, Article 103362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103362
Guo, K., & Wang, D. (2024). To resist it or to embrace it? Examining ChatGPT’s potential to support teacher feedback in EFL writing. Education and Information Technologies, 29(7), 8435-8463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12146-0
Guo, K., Pan, M., Li, Y., & Lai, C. (2024). Effects of an AI-supported approach to peer feedback on university EFL students’ feedback quality and writing ability. The Internet and Higher Education, 63, Article 100962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100962
Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 1–27). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hayes, J. R. (2000). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In R. Indrisano & J. R. Squire (Eds.), Perspectives on writing: Research, theory, and practice (pp. 6–44). International Reading Association.
Hayes, J. R. (2012). Modeling and remodeling writing. Written Communication, 29(3), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088312451260
Jiang, Z., Xu, Z., Pan, Z., He, J., & Xie, K. (2023). Exploring the role of artificial intelligence in facilitating assessment of writing performance in second language learning. Languages, 8(4), Article 247. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8040247
Kirk, R., Mediratta, I., Nalmpantis, C., Luketina, J., Hambro, E., Grefenstette, E., & Raileanu, R. (2024). Understanding the effects of RLHF on LLM generalisation and diversity. In B. Kim, Y. Yue, S. Chaudhuri, K. Fragkiadaki, M. Khan, & Y. Sun (Eds.), International Conference on Learning Representations (pp. 1-34). https://proceedings.iclr.cc/paper_files/paper/2024/file/5a68d05006d5b05dd9463dd9c0219db0-Paper-Conference.pdf
Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2013). Keystroke logging in writing research: Using inputlog to analyze and visualize writing processes. Written Communication, 30(3), 358–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313491692
Lim, F. V. (2026). Designing literacy learning with multimodality in the age of Generative AI. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 29(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v29i1.694
Lin, H., Wei, W., Zou, B., & Zheng, Y. (2026). Interactive reading patterns and metacognitive strategies from surface to deep levels of L2 learners in GenAI-assisted critical reading. Discover Computing, 29, Article 187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-026-10069-1
Liu, M., Zhang, L. J., & Biebricher, C. (2024). Investigating students’ cognitive processes in generative AI-assisted digital multimodal composing and traditional writing. Computers & Education, 211, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104977
Mahapatra, S. (2024). Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills: A mixed methods intervention study. Smart Learning Environments, 11(9), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00295-9
Moon, K., Green, A. E., & Kushlev, K. (2025). Homogenizing effect of large language models (LLMs) on creative diversity: An empirical comparison of human and ChatGPT writing. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 6, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100207
Nugroho, A., Andriyanti, E., Widodo, P., & Mutiaraningrum, I. (2025). Students’ appraisals post-ChatGPT use: Students’ narrative after using ChatGPT for writing. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 62(2), 499–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2024.2319184
O’Neill, E. M. (2019). Training students to use online translators and dictionaries: The impact on second language writing scores. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 8(2), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2019.4002
Parasuraman, R., & Manzey, D. H. (2010). Complacency and bias in human use of automation: An attentional integration. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 52(3), 381–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720810376055
Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2022). Sociocultural theory and second language development. In C. Coombe & H. Mohebbi (Eds.), Research questions in language education and applied linguistics (pp. 871–877). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79143-8_150
Prihandoko, L.A., Amalia, S.N., Ardi, P., & Waluyo, B. (2026). Applying AI for English Language instruction and material development in schools: A PLS-SEM approach. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 8(2), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.58304/ijts.251020
Révész, A., Michel, M., & Lee, M.J. (2017). Investigating IELTS academic writing task 2: Relationships between cognitive writing processes, text quality, and working memory. (IELTS Research Report Online Series). British Council, Cambridge English Language Assessment and IDP.
Schoonen, R., Gelderen, A. V., Glopper, K. D., Hulstijn, J., Simis, A., Snellings, P., & Stevenson, M. (2003). First language and second language writing: The role of linguistic knowledge, speed of processing, and metacognitive knowledge. Language Learning, 53(1), 165–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00213
Séror, J., & Gentil, G. (2023). Direct observation of writing activity: Screen capture technologies. In R. M. Manchón & J. Roca de Larios (Eds.), Research methods in the study of L2 writing processes (Vol. 5, pp. 141–160). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.5.07ser
Shabara, R., ElEbyary, K., & Boraie, D. (2024). Teachers or ChatGPT: The issue of accuracy and consistency in L2 assessment. Teaching English with Technology, 24(2), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.56297/vaca6841/LRDX3699/XSEZ5215
Shin, D., & Lee, J. H. (2024). Exploratory study on the potential of ChatGPT as a rater of second language writing. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 24735-24757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12817-6
Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023). Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: Assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843
Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J. J., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022193728205
Tam, A. C. F. (2024). Interacting with ChatGPT for internal feedback and factors affecting feedback quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 50(2), 219-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2374485
Teng, M. F. (2024). “ChatGPT is the companion, not enemies”: EFL learners’ perceptions and experiences in using ChatGPT for feedback in writing. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100270
Teng, M. F. (2025). A systematic review of ChatGPT for English as a foreign language writing: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 6(3), 36–57. https://doi.org/10.58304/ijts.20240304
Tsai, C.-Y., Lin, Y.-T., & Brown, I. K. (2024). Impacts of ChatGPT-assisted writing for EFL English majors: Feasibility and challenges. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 22427–22445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12722-y
Turpin, M., Michael, J., Perez, E., & Bowman, S. (2023). Language models don’t always say what they think: Unfaithful explanations in chain-of-thought prompting. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 74952–74965. https://doi.org/10.52202/075280-3275
Vinall, K., Wen, W., & Hellmich, E. A. (2023). Investigating L2 writers’ uses of machine translation and other online tools. Foreign Language Annals, 57(2), 499–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12733
Vygotsky, L. S. (2012). Thought and language, revised and expanded edition. MIT Press.
Warschauer, M., Tseng, W., Yim, S., Webster, T., Jacob, S., Du, Q., & Tate, T. (2023). The affordances and contradictions of AI-generated text for writers of English as a second or foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 62, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101071
Wiboolyasarin, W., Chomchuen, F., Kamonsawad, R., Boonprawes, S., Wiboolyasarin, K., & Jinowat, N. (2026). Timing is everything: Investigating the impact of immediate, delayed, and combined AI-generated feedback on L2 writing proficiency. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102790
Wiboolyasarin, W., Wiboolyasarin, K., Suwanwihok, K., Jinowat, N., & Muenjanchoey, R. (2024). Synergizing collaborative writing and AI feedback: An investigation into enhancing L2 writing proficiency in wiki-based environments. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100228
Xu, W., & Zhu, X. (2024). Examining metacognitive strategy use in L1 and L2 task-situated writing: Effects, transferability, and cross-language facilitation. Metacognition and Learning, 19, 773–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-024-09387-w
Yan, D. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum: An exploratory investigation. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 13943–13967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11742-4
Yang, C., Li, R., & Yang, L. (2025). Revisiting trends in GenAI-assisted second language writing: Retrospect and prospect. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 63(7-8), 1819-1863. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331251367309
Yang, L., & Li, R. (2024). ChatGPT for L2 learning: Current status and implications. System, 124, Article 103351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103351
Yu, L., Kong, Q., & Hao, H. (2024). Artificial intelligence-assisted Chinese L2 writing: An empirical study on educational sustainability in Africa. Rupkatha Journal, 16(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v16n2.01
Zou, M., & Huang, L. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT on L2 writing and expected responses: Voice from doctoral students. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 13201-13219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12397-x