Meaning-Making in Invitations in Global Englishes: A Cross-Cultural Systemic Functional Study of Indonesian and Yemeni EFL Learners

Authors

  • Ali Mohammed Saleh Al-Hamzi Mahweet University Author
  • Ni Wayan Sartini Airlangga University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v26i2.671

Keywords:

Direct Invitation, Indirect Invitation, SFL, Indonesian EFL Learners, Politeness, Yemeni EFL Learners

Abstract

This paper explores the meaning-making in performative speech acts of invitation in Global Englishes, with particular reference to Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) theory, focusing on comparing EFL learners from Indonesia and Yemen. Using a quantitative descriptive research design, thirty EFL students from Indonesia, namely Airlangga University, and thirty EFL students from Yemen, Sana’a University, took part in a Discourse Completion Task (DCT). From the analysis, it is revealed that Indonesian students preferred using ‘indirect strategies,’ such as ‘Yes/No questions,’ ‘asking for willingness,’ and ‘Wh-questions,’ as they carry ‘ordered density,’ whereas EFL students from Yemen used ‘direct strategies,’ i.e., ‘imperatives,’ ‘Yes/No questions,’ as it is ‘acceptable’ in social practice. There is an influence of L1 transfer in both groups, as they preferred transferring ‘utterances’ from L1 English, ignoring ‘syntactic differences.’

References

Agbo, I. I., Anya, M. E., & Kadiri, G. C. (2026). A speech act analysis of selected dialogues in Nigerian home movies. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2025.2587070

Al-Hamzi, A. M. S., Ni, W. S., Hapsari, N. F., Gougui, A., & Al-Nozili, R. M. A. (2020). A cross-cultural pragmatic study of invitation strategies as produced by Indonesian and Yemeni EFL language learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 9(6), 42–49.

Al-Hamzi, A. M. S., Wiratno, T., Anis, M. Y., Jamal, M., & Cahyaning, A. (2023). A socio-pragmatic study of a sincere invitation in Yemeni spoken Arabic. PAROLE: Journal of Linguistics and Education, 13(1), 43–55.

Al Marrani, Y. M. A., & Suraih, N. S. (2019). Invitation strategies as produced by Yemeni EFL learners. Applied Linguistics Research Journal, 3(2), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.14744/alrj.2019.19483

Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085

Crystal, D. (2019). The Cambridge encyclopedia of the English language (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Dlali, M. (2001). Politeness theory and requests in Xhosa (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Stellenbosch.

Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd ed.). Continuum.

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face interaction. Aldine.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2013). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge.

Hancher, M. (1979). The classification of cooperative illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 8(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500005911

Isaacs, E. A., & Clark, H. H. (1990). Ostensible invitations. Language in Society, 19(4), 493–509. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500014780

Jakučionytė, V. (2020). Cross-cultural communication: Creativity and politeness strategies across cultures. Creativity Studies, 13(1), 164–178. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2020.9025

Jenkins, J., & Panero, S. M. (2024). Global Englishes: A resource book for students. Routledge.

Kapoor, S. (2022). “Don’t act like a Sati-Savitri!”: Hinglish and other impoliteness strategies in Indian YouTube comments. Journal of Pragmatics, 189, 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.12.009

Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.

Leech, G., & Larina, T. (2014). Politeness: West and East. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 18(4), 9–34. https://journals.rudn.ru/linguistics/article/view/9380

Li, Y., & Wongwaropakorn, W. (2024). Analyzing politeness and refusal speech acts in popular Chinese television drama series. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1), 2367327. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2367327

Llinares, A., & McCabe, A. (2023). Systemic functional linguistics: The perfect match for content and language integrated learning. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 26(3), 245–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1635985

Lu, D. (2001). Cultural features in speech acts: A Sino-American comparison. Language Culture and Curriculum, 14(3), 214-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310108666623

Pandharipande, R. (1992). Defining politeness in Indian English. World Englishes, 11(2–3), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1992.tb00068.x

Pateda, M. (1990). Sosiolinguistik Suatu Pengantar. PT Gramedia.

Pizziconi, B. (2003). Re-examining politeness, face and the Japanese language. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(10–11), 1471–1506. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00200-X

Rahmayanti, I., Rokhman, F., Mardikantoro, H. B., & Pristiwati, R. (2025). Language, strategy, and influence: A pragmatic analysis of Indonesian YouTube influencers and their impact on social media. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 12(1), 2531180. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2025.2531180

Rahayu, N. W. (2021). Speech act of pragmatic. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 9(2), 538–542. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v9i2.1926

Revita, I., Oktavianus, O., Anindya Zalfikhe, F., & Syaputri, W. (2025). Cultural nuances in pre-request speech acts: a pragmatic analysis of the Minangkabau language. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 12(1), 2449285. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2449285

Rose, H., Sahan, K., & Zhou, S. (2022). Global English medium instruction: Perspectives at the crossroads of global Englishes and EMI. Asian Englishes, 24(2), 160-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2022.2056794

Sadeghpour, M., & D’Angelo, J. (2022). World Englishes and ‘Global Englishes’: Competing or complementary paradigms? Asian Englishes, 24(2), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2022.2076368

Schleppegrell, M. J., & Oteíza, T. (2023). Systemic functional linguistics: Exploring meaning in language. In M. Handford & J. P. Gee (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 156–169). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003035244

Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning. Cambridge University Press.

Sembiante, S. F., & Tian, Z. (2021). Culturally sustaining approaches to academic languaging through systemic functional linguistics. Language and Education, 35(2), 101–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2021.1896538

Spradley, J. P. (2016). The ethnographic interview. Waveland Press.

Sukesti, L. A. (2014). Interlanguage pragmatics of invitation by Indonesian EFL learners. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Teshaboyeva, N., & Erkaboyeva, S. (2025). Speech acts and their functions in communication. ACUMEN: International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(5), 272–279. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15524482

Widanta, I. M. R. J., Handayani, L. N. C., & Ardika, I. W. D. (2023). Invitation strategy and learners’ controlled politeness. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 6(2), 266–280. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v6i2.65622

Widodo, H. P., Fang, F., & Elyas, T. (2022). Designing English language materials from the perspective of Global Englishes. Asian Englishes, 24(2), 186-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2022.2062540

Wolfson, N. (1989). Perspectives: Sociolinguistics and TESOL. Newbury House.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Yule, G. (2022). The study of language (8th ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Al-Hamzi, A. M. S., & Sartini , N. W. . (2026). Meaning-Making in Invitations in Global Englishes: A Cross-Cultural Systemic Functional Study of Indonesian and Yemeni EFL Learners. Journal of Language and Literature, 26(2), 326-338. https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v26i2.671

Similar Articles

1-10 of 16

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.