Describing the Indescribable: Repressive Regime and Discourse Productivity in Jekyll and Hyde
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v26i1.66Keywords:
Foucault, Jekyll and Hyde, narrative discourse, repressionAbstract
This paper investigates the paradox of language and repression in Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, focusing on how the narrative persistently avoids describing Edward Hyde in precise, objective terms. Despite Hyde’s centrality to the plot, characters repeatedly fail or refuse to articulate his physical appearance. Drawing on Michel Foucault’s “repressive hypothesis,” the study argues that the narrative’s avoidance of descriptive language constitutes a form of discursive repression, a regime that limits what can be said, yet paradoxically stimulates more discourse. Using close textual analysis grounded in narratology and Foucauldian theory, the paper identifies a formal pattern in which descriptions of Hyde emerge only in vague, affective terms followed immediately by disavowal or narrative deferral. These moments of muteness and subsequent verbal excess suggest that repression does not silence but incites discourse. The study further argues that this dynamic is not a narrative flaw but a structural feature serving both the detective and gothic genre conventions. The repression of descriptive language sustains suspense while reinforcing thematic concerns about the limits of rationality and the boundaries of the knowable self. Ultimately, Hyde’s indescribability is not a gap in the story but the engine of its discourse. His mystery is not maintained by silence, but by the repeated failure to describe him.
References
Arata, S. (1995). The Sedulous Ape: Atavism, Professionalism, and Stevenson’s “Jekyll and Hyde.” Criticism, 37(2), 233–259.
Blommestein, M. (2011). The Victorian Gender Ideology and Women in the British Caribbean in the Post-Emancipation Era. History in Action, 2(1).
Campbell, C. (2014). Women and Sadism in Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde: “City in a Nightmare.” English Literature in Transition, 1880-1920, 57(3), 309–323.
Coelho, M. M. (2023). R. L. Stevenson – The storyteller and the harvest of dreams. Junguiana, 41(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.70435/junguiana.v41i1.17
Cook, J. (2020). “The Stain of Breath Upon a Mirror”: The Unitary Self in Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Criticism: A Quarterly for Literature and the Arts, 62(1), 93–115.
Danahay, M. (2013). Dr. Jekyll’s Two Bodies. Nineteenth-Century Contexts, 35(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/08905495.2013.770616
Darby, D. (2001). Form and Context: An Essay in the History of Narratology. Poetics Today, 22(4), 829–852. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-22-4-829
Dean, C. J. (1994). The Productive Hypothesis: Foucault, Gender, and the History of Sexuality. History and Theory, 33(3), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.2307/2505475
Eigner, E. M. (1966). Robert Louis Stevenson and Romantic Tradition. Princeton University Press.
Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality: Vol. Volume I: An Introduction. Pantheon Books.
Gabriele, G. (2005). Research Methods for English Studies (Second Edition). Edinburgh University Press.
Ganz, M. J. (2015). Carrying On Like a Madman: Insanity and Responsibility in Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Nineteenth-Century Literature, 70(3), 363–397.
Goldman, A. H. (2011). The Appeal of the Mystery. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 69(3), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6245.2011.01470.x
Jacke, J. (2014). Is There a Context-Free Way of Understanding Texts? The Case of Structuralist Narratology. Journal of Literary Theory, 8(1), 118–139. https://doi.org/10.1515/jlt-2014-0005
Jackson, E. A. B. (2013). Twins, Twinship, and Robert Louis Stevenson’s “Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.” Victorian Review, 39(1), 70–86.
Manning, P. M. (2018). The Hyde We Live in: Stevenson, Evolution, and the Anthropogenic Fog. Victorian Literature and Culture, 46(1), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1060150317000389
Martens, B. (2011). Dramatic Monologue, Detective Fiction, and the Search for Meaning. Nineteenth-Century Literature, 66(2), 195–218. https://doi.org/10.1525/ncl.2011.66.2.195
O’Dell, B. D. (2012). Character Crisis: Hegemonic Negotiations in Robert Louis Stevenson’s Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Victorian Literature and Culture, 40(2), 509–521. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1060150312000071
Olson, E. T. (2003). Was Jekyll Hyde? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 66(2), 328–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00264.x
Sanna, A. (2012). Silent Homosexuality in Oscar Wilde’s Teleny and The Picture of Dorian Gray and Robert Louis Stevenson’s Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde. Law & Literature, 24(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1525/lal.2012.24.1.21
Stevenson, R. L. (2005). The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde (M. A. Danahay, Ed.). Broadview Editions.
Wai, W. H. (2019). The Imagination of Criminals in Victorian London in Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Interlitteraria, 24(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.12697/IL.2019.24.1.7
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 M. Irfan Zamzami (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
