Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026): March 2026
Articles

Exploring the ideology of narrative text Lutung Kesarung: Peirce’s social semiotic perspective

I Ketut Suardana
Bali Dwipa University, Indonesia
Nidya Fitri
Universitas Andalas, Indonesia

Published 19-05-2026

Keywords

  • harmony,
  • Lutung Kesarung,
  • self-control,
  • selfish,
  • social semiotic

How to Cite

Suardana, I. K., & Fitri, N. (2026). Exploring the ideology of narrative text Lutung Kesarung: Peirce’s social semiotic perspective. International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS), 9(2), 321-332. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.v9i2.785

Abstract

Lutung Kesarung is a popular Indonesian folktale. Nevertheless, many communities cannot find the appropriate ideology of the text. This research aims to explore the ideology of this text from Peirce’s social semiotic perspective. It is a qualitative, phenomenological research to reveal the social phenomenon related to the Lutung Kesarung text. Lutung means monkey, which is associated with greed, while Kesarung is interpreted as destruction. Therefore, the interpretation of Lutung Kesarung is that a greedy person will be destroyed by his/her own character. The theory used in this research is social semiotics, proposed by Peirce. The research results show that the text teaches readers to practice positive social behaviours in every social situation. In addition, the text teaches readers to improve their quality of life for a better future instead of dwelling on past bad events.  The research results are expected to provide positive impacts on the development of Discourse Analysis, Semiology, and Language Philosophy fields. Furthermore, it may help future studies explore the ideologies of other local narrative texts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Adji, S. E. P. (2020). Power relations in two contemporary Indonesian novels with political themes. International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS), 4(1), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.v4i1.2788
  2. Batubara, M. H. (2020). An analysis of speech functions on the banking and daily need billboard texts. International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS), 4(1), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.v4i1.2816
  3. Cahyani. (2021). Transkrip cerita rakyat Lutung Kesarung (Cerita rakyat Jawa Barat). Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha. https://repo.undiksha.ac.id/7401/9/1712011001-LAMPIRAN.pdf
  4. Calingasan, K. A., & Plata, S. M. (2022). Effects of effort praise on struggling Filipino ESL readers’ motivation and mindset. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(3), 601–611. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i3.32898
  5. Danesi, M. (2007). The quest for meaning: A guide to semiotic theory and practice. University of Toronto Press.
  6. Fatiya, R., Kusumaningsih, D., Wicaksana, M. F., Saptomo, S. W., & Hanafi, H. (2025). Strengthening spiritual representation through Charles Sanders Peirce’s semiotic analysis in the song Gala Bunga Matahari. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 7(1), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v7i1.107-131
  7. Ganzin, M., Gephart, R. P., & Suddaby, R. (2014). Narrative and the construction of myths in organizations. In F. Cooren, E. Vaara, A. Langley, & H. Tsoukas (Eds.), Language and communication at work: Discourse, narrativity, and organizing (1st ed., pp. 219–260). Oxford University Press.
  8. Gumanay, J. C. (2023). More human than human: Posthumanism in literary discourse. International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS), 7(1), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.v7i1.6265
  9. Halliday, M. A. K. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (M. I. M. Matthiessen, Ed.; 4th ed.). Routledge.
  10. Haq Aslama, D., Haeruddin, Haeriyyah, & Ramadhan, I. (2025). Sensual symbols and social confusion: Revealing the expression of love in “Qoddukal Mayyās” lyrics through Riffaterre’s semiotic lens. Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, 7(2), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.31849/09jb7491
  11. Hellystia, D., & Hermawati, S. (2024). Leveraging L1 folklore: Enhancing fictional narrative writing with metacognitive strategies in blended learning environments. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 30(2), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2024-3002-16
  12. Herman, L., & Vervack, B. (2003). Handbook of narrative analysis. University of Nebraska Press.
  13. Hobart, M. (2022). Cultural studies and everyday life: A Balinese case. Jurnal Kajian Bali, 12(2), 627–647. https://doi.org/10.24843/JKB.2022.v12.i02.p15
  14. Isnendes, R. (2023). Material artifacts of Sundanese looms with hypogram on the figure of Nyai Pohaci in carita pantun Lutung Kasarung. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(3), 752–764. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i3.47942
  15. Kiose, M. I., Khulkhachieva, Z. S., Izyumskaya-Kapitonova, V. V., & Barmin, A. V. (2025). Lexical-semantic clustering in the diagnostics of culture integration in discourse. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 11(4), 63-84. https://doi.org/10.18413/2313-8912-2025-11-4-0-4
  16. Merrell, F. (2001). Charles Sanders Peirce’s concept of the sign. In P. Cobley (Ed.), The Routledge companion to semiotics and linguistics (1st ed., p. 2). Routledge.
  17. Pitana, I. G. (2025). Pundukdawa movement: In search of identity, deconstructing ideology of hierarchy in contemporary Bali. Jurnal Kajian Bali, 15(3), 913–929. https://doi.org/10.24843/JKB.2025.v15.i03.p02
  18. Raharjo, S. H., Utami, S., Ningrum, D., Akhmad, F., & Masbukhin, A. (2025). Harmoni manusia, alam, dan Tuhan dalam praktik Tri Hita Karana pada pendidikan lingkungan hidup di Desa Krisik. Jayapangus Press Jurnal Penelitian Agama Hindu, 9(1), 57-70. https://doi.org/10.37329/jpah.v9i1.3521
  19. Rahmawati, I. S., Sutrisna, D., & Septiaji, A. (2022). Nilai-nilai kearifan lokal dan pendidikan karakter dalam cerita rakyat Lutung Kasarung. Diglosia: Jurnal Pendidikan, Kebahasaan, dan Kesusasteraan Indonesia, 6(2), 1147-1157. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v9i2.4397
  20. Roothooft, H. (2025). EFL students’ attitudes to oral corrective feedback in two different contexts: Spain versus Algeria. Journal of Language and Education, 11(4), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2025.21433
  21. Sari, I. A. L., & Nyoman Darma Putra, I. (2020). Narrative on nature conservation: A comparative study of the folktales of Bali Aga and Ainu. Kemanusiaan, 27(2), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.21315/KAJH2020.27.2.4
  22. Sayogie, F., Farkhan, M., Zubair, Julian, H. P., Al Hakim, H. S. F., & Wiralaksana, M. G. (2023). Patriarchal ideology, Andrew Tate, and Rumble’s podcasts. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 29(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2023-2902-01
  23. Shofiya, A., & Basuni, M. (2023). Communication strategies performed in an English as lingua franca context and their contributions toward students’ engagement. International Journal of English Linguistics, Literature, and Education (IJELLE), 8(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v8i2.1439
  24. Suardana, I. K. (2023). Social semiotic of Covid-19 health protocol: Systemic functional linguistics. Script Journal: Journal of Linguistics and English Teaching, 8(2), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.24903/sj.v8i2.998
  25. Suardana, I. K., & Semadi, Y. P. (2026). Semiotika sosial teks “I Cupak Teken I Gerantang” dengan konsep Tri Hita Karana: Kajian linguistik sistemik fungsional. HUMANIS: Journal of Arts and Humanities, 30(1), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.24843/JH.2026.v30.i01.p07
  26. Subandiyah, H., Supratno, H., Permata, R., Fahri, & Abida, F. I. N. (2023). Philological analysis of the Sundanese folklore “Lutung Kasarung.” JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 11(4), 683-695. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v11i4.8891
  27. Toan, L. N. (2025). Enhancing administrative texts through cohesive devices and narrative elements. Jurnal Arbitrer, 12(2), 210–226. https://doi.org/10.25077/ar.12.2.210-226.2025
  28. Todd, R. W. (2023). Cohesion and coherence analyses of extended written schizophrenic discourse: An exploratory case study. rEFLections, 30(2), 180-202. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v30i2.265574
  29. Widyastuti, S. H. (2022). Semiotic analysis in Islamic-Javanese healing texts. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(3), 684–696. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i3.43708
  30. Wilang, J. D. (2024). Inferring the relationship between gratitude and mindset in EFL context. Issues in Language Studies, 13(1), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.5990.2024