Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026): March 2026
Articles

The role of AIPA in mediating ethnic conflicts in Myanmar after the 2021 coup: A normative constructivist perspective

PDF
  • Fathan Rafiqi,
  • Muhammad Fajhriyadi Hastira,
  • Surwandono
Fathan Rafiqi
Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
Muhammad Fajhriyadi Hastira
Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
Bio
Surwandono
Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Published 13-05-2026

Keywords

  • AIPA,
  • Myanmar Ethnic Conflict,
  • normative constructivism,
  • parliamentary diplomacy,
  • regional norm formation

Copyright (c) 2026 Fathan Rafiqi, Muhammad Fajhriyadi Hastira, Surwandono (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Rafiqi, F., Hastira, M. F., & Surwandono. (2026). The role of AIPA in mediating ethnic conflicts in Myanmar after the 2021 coup: A normative constructivist perspective. International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS), 9(2), 310-320. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.v9i2.60

Abstract

This study analyses the strategic role of the ASEAN Inter-Parliamentary Assembly (AIPA) in resolving ethnic tensions in Myanmar after the February 2021 coup, to evaluate the impact of parliamentary diplomacy on the establishment of regional standards. The employed methodology is qualitative literature research, examining source documents such as AIPA decisions from the 42nd to 44th General Assemblies (2021–2023), alongside secondary literature using content analysis within a constructivist normative framework. The findings indicate that AIPA effectively launched the establishment of norms by articulating concepts of inclusivity and human rights in the General Assembly communiqué and securing extensive parliamentary backing for the Five-Point Consensus. The norm cascade stage was evident when the national parliaments of Indonesia and Malaysia repudiated the Myanmar military junta and interacted with the National Unity Government. The March 2023 fact-finding mission and the creation of an ad hoc monitoring committee helped people follow the rules better. It was hard to do because AIPA resolutions are not binding, and political commitments in each country differ. These results show that AIPA is a "norm entrepreneur" and that parliamentary diplomacy needs better compliance mechanisms to have an effect on real policy.

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Adiputri, R. D. (2024). Interpreting Multilateral Diplomacy in the Indonesian Parliament’s Debates on Climate Crisis and Sustainability. Parliaments, Estates and Representation, 45(1), 152–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/02606755.2024.2380551
  2. ASEAN Inter-Parliamentary Assembly. (2021). Joint communiqué of the 42nd AIPA general assembly. https://aipasecretariat.org/post-event-press-release-outcomes-of-the-42nd-aipa-general-assembly/
  3. ASEAN Inter-Parliamentary Assembly. 2023. 44th AIPA general assembly.
  4. ASEAN Inter-Parliamentary Assembly. 2024. Joint communique of the forty-fifth (45th) general assembly of the ASEAN Inter-Parliamentary Assembly (AIPA). AIPA. https://www.aipasecretariat.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Joint-Communique-45th-AIPA-General-Assembly.pdf
  5. ASEAN Inter-Parliamentary Assembly. (2025). What is AIPA? https://aipasecretariat.org/what-is-aipa/
  6. ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights. (2021). APHR urges AIPA to support democracy and the human rights of Myanmar’s members of parliament. https://aseanmp.org/publications/post/aphr-urges-aipa-to-support-democracy-and-the-human-rights-of-myanmars-members-of-parliament
  7. Bhattarai, G., & Bista, P. (2024). Fissure in South Asian regionalism in the age of great powers rivalry: A small state’s perspective. The Journal of Cross-Regional Dialogues/La Revue de dialogues inter-régionaux, 5. https://doi.org/10.25518/2593-9483.309
  8. Costa, O., & Brack, N. (2020). The role of the European Parliament in Europe’s integration and parliamentarization process. In O. Costa, C. Dri, & S. Stavridis (Eds.), Parliamentary dimensions of regionalization and globalization (pp. 45-69). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137322746_3
  9. Chalmers, D. (2024). ASEAN: Moving from the nation state to the ASEAN state. In J. A. Kämmerer, H.-B. Schäfer, & K. Basu, The EU reexamined (pp. 283-303). Edward Elgar.
  10. Chusnaini, A. (2023). Upaya ASEAN dalam membangun kepercayaan antara junta militer dan NUG pada kudeta militer di Myanmar tahun 2021 hingga 2022 [Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Bakrie].
  11. Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550789
  12. Howe, B. M. (2021). Challenges to and opportunities for international organisation in East Asia. Global Society, 35(4), 501-521. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2021.1942800
  13. Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre. (2020). Global report on internal displacement 2020. https://www.internal-displacement.org/global-report/grid2020/
  14. International Crisis Group. (2025). Myanmar's Dangerous Drift: Conflict, Elections and Looming Regional Détente. https://www.crisisgroup.org/brf/asia/south-east-asia/myanmar/b184-myanmars-dangerous-drift-conflict-elections-and-looming-regional-detente
  15. Jones, W. (2024). From 1993 to 2023: 30 years of human rights process in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Migration Letters, 21(S6), 797–816. https://migrationletters.com/index.php/ml/article/view/8004
  16. Kamal, A., & Fujimatsu, R. (2024). From humanitarian resistance to resilience: Nation-building in active conflict. Humanitarian Practice Network. https://odihpn.org/en/publication/from-humanitarian-resistance-to-resilience-nation-building-in-active-conflict/
  17. Kobayashi, K., Krause, K., & Yuan, X. (2025). (Re)setting the boundaries of peacebuilding in a changing global order. Contemporary Security Policy, 46(2), 226-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2025.2466287
  18. Lenz, T., Burilkov, A., & Viola, L. A. (2019). Legitimacy and the cognitive sources of international institutional change: The case of regional parliamentarization. International Studies Quarterly, 63(4), 1094–1107. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqz051
  19. Manea, M.-G. (2015). Human rights and the interregional dialogue between Asia and Europe: ASEAN–EU relations and ASEM. The pacific Review, 21(3), 369-396. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740802134257
  20. Minnella, C., Pathak, S., & Scauso, M. S. (2024). The tension within norms: Agency and risks in pursuit of global climate justice. Global Studies Quarterly, 4(2), Article ksae019. https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksae019
  21. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2023). Situation of human rights in Myanmar. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/2023-03/myanmar-factsheet.pdf
  22. Pelaudeix, C. (2023). Differentiated regionalism and China’s global agenda: EU, ASEAN, Mercosur between resilience and strategic autonomy (Doctoral dissertation, Université Grenoble Alpes). HAL Thèses. https://theses.hal.science/tel-04514469v1/file/PELAUDEIX_2023_diffusion.pdf
  23. Pogodda, S., Richmond, O. P., & Visoka, G. (2023). Failed peacemaking: Counter-peace and international order. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4824866
  24. Ramcharan, R. (2025). The ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights: Prevention, mitigation, remedies and redress. Routledge.
  25. Ridwan, M. A., Farid, M., & Dwiastuti, I. (2022). The role of Indonesian House of Representatives in parliamentary diplomacy to resolve the Myanmar humanitarian crisis in 2017–2019. Journal of International Relations, 2(2), 58–68. https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/GLI/article/view/19590
  26. Rüland, J., & Bechle, K. (2014). Defending state-centric regionalism through mimicry and localisation: Regional parliamentary bodies in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and Mercosur. Journal of International Relations and Development, 17, 61-88. https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2013.3
  27. Rüland, J., & Carrapatoso, A. (2015). Democratizing inter-regionalism? In The EU Parliament and its Asia relations. Taylor & Francis.
  28. Rüland, J. (2009). Deepening ASEAN cooperation through democratization? The Indonesian legislature and foreign policymaking. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 9(3), 373–402. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26159444
  29. Skidmore, M. W., & Ware, A. (2023). Post-coup Myanmar’s political and humanitarian crises. In M. W. Skidmore & A. Ware (Eds.), After the coup: Myanmar’s political and humanitarian crises (Vol. 1, pp. 1–24). ANU Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/AC.2023.01
  30. The Economist Intelligence Unit. (2023). Democracy index 2023. https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2023/
  31. Trang, N. M. (2022). ASEAN cooperation in COVID-19 pandemic. In Q. M. Pham, D. Briesen, & T. T. T. Nguyen, Times of uncertainty: National policies and international relations under COVID- in Southeast-Asia and beyond (pp. 175–194). Nomos.
  32. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2023). Annual report. https://reporting.unhcr.org/global-report-2023
  33. Yıldız, A. (2024). Role of the parliamentary dimension in regional integration process: The case of the ASEAN Inter-Parliamentary Assembly (AIPA) (Doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University). METU Open Access. https://open.metu.edu.tr/handle/11511/112273