Use of the modal 'shall' for expressing flexibility and constraint in Access Bank loan agreements
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examined the use of the modal verb "shall" in Access Bank’s Lending Against Turnover Loan Terms and Conditions to determine how it expresses both flexibility and constraint, achieving the bank's goals of enforceable obligations and adaptable terms. The objectives included analyzing how "shall" conveys borrower commitments, mitigates financial risk, and allows responsiveness to economic fluctuations. A qualitative content analysis was conducted on the loan agreement, focusing on excerpts that illustrate various uses of "shall" to balance strict and conditional obligations. Major findings revealed that "shall" serves to create mandatory borrower responsibilities while permitting certain terms to be adjusted based on external conditions, aligning with financial industry practices of ensuring clarity and adaptability. The study concluded that "shall" is a crucial linguistic tool in legal and financial documents, achieving the dual goals of risk management and operational flexibility. This research contributes new knowledge to linguistics and financial studies by illustrating how a single modal verb can enforce obligations and accommodate evolving economic contexts, revealing the adaptive nature of contractual language in finance.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Aijmer, K. (2002). Modality in language: Theory and description. Cambridge University Press.
Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. Continuum International Publishing Group.
Blakemore, D. (1994). Evidence and modality. In R. E. Asher (Ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics (pp. 1183–1186). Pergamon Press.
Bublitz, W. (1992). Transferred negation and modality. Journal of Pragmatics, 18(6), 551–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(92)90119-V
Butler, C. S. (2003). Structure and function: A guide to three major structural-functional theories. John Benjamins Publishing.
Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W. (1994). The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. University of Chicago Press.
Calbert, J. P. (1975). Toward the semantics of modality. In J. P. Calbert & H. Vater (Eds.), Aspekte der modalität. Gunter Narr.
Collins, P. (1991). The modals of obligation and necessity in Australian English. In K. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (Eds.), English corpus linguistics (pp. 145–165). Longman.
Coates, J. (1983). The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. Routledge.
Crystal, D., & Davy, D. (1969). Investigating English style. Longman.
Downing, A., & Locke, P. (2006). English grammar: A university course (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Gerhardt, J. (1991). The meaning and use of modals HAFTA, NEEDTA, and WANNA in children's speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 16(6), 531–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(91)90102-4
Gotti, M. (2003). Specialized discourse: Linguistic features and changing conventions. Peter Lang.
Halliday, M. A. K. (2003a). Systemic background (1985). In J. Webster (Ed.), On language and linguistics (Volume 3 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, pp. 185–198). Continuum.
Halliday, M. A. K. (2003b). Systemic grammar and the concept of a “science of language” (1992). In J. Webster (Ed.), On language and linguistics (Volume 3 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, pp. 199–212). Continuum.
Halliday, M. A. K. (2003c). Introduction: On the "architecture" of human language. In J. Webster (Ed.), On language and linguistics (Volume 3 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, pp. 1–29). Continuum.
Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). Introduction: How big is a language? On the power of language. In J. Webster (Ed.), The language of science (Volume 5 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, pp. xi–xxiv). Continuum.
Jegede, O. O. (2018a). Circumstances and their roles in the development of editorials. World Journal of English Language, 8(2), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v8n2p21
Jegede, O. O. (2018b). Interpersonal meaning in Nigeria’s President Muhammadu Buhari’s 2015 victory speech. Papers in English and Linguistics, 19(3&4), 183–195.
Jegede, O. O. (2020a). Process types in Governor Seyi Makinde’s broadcast on COVID-19. Journal of Language, Theatre and Literary Studies (JOLATALS), 1(1), 42–47.
Jegede, O. O. (2020b). Syntactic analysis of Donald Trump’s inaugural speech. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies on Humanities, 3(3), 317–327. https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v3i3.11068
Jegede, O. O. (2022). Nominal choices in Nigerian newspaper editorials: A functional grammar approach. American Research Journal of English and Literature, 8(1), 70-75. https://arjonline.org/papers/arjel/v8-i1/15.pdf
Jegede, O. O., & Omotayo, A. O. (2024). Framing loss through language: Analyzing transitivity in Hillary Clinton's concession speech. GUU Journal of Humanities, 3(2), 24–40.
Kjær, A. L. (2007). Language and globalization. Routledge.
Leech, G. (2004). Meaning and the English verb (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Palmer, F. R. (2001). Mood and modality (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Saeed, J. I. (2003). Sentence semantics 1: Situations: Modality and evidentiality. In J. I. Saeed, Semantics (2nd ed., pp. 135–143). Blackwell.
Tiersma, P. M. (1999). Legal language. University of Chicago Press.
Williams, C., & Davies, C. (2016). Legal language in action: Linguistic dynamics of law and modernity. Oxford University Press.